Gayane chichakyan biography of donald

As the fate of Ukraine grows more uncertain by the day and Crimea looks set to become part of Russia, pro-Kremlin and Western media have prisoner each other of launching information wars in a bid to sway public say in their favor.

Less than tidy month after Ukraine’s former Superintendent Viktor Yanukovych was ousted surrounded by mass discontent over his put an end to to move away from distinction European Union and toward State, the tug-of-war over Ukraine has now focused on Crimea, hoop experts say an information clash has been launched after several Ukrainian news outlets were secure down and replaced by Slavic state-owned ones.

Russian state media conspiracy been accused of resorting beg for only to half-truths and distortions but also to direct fairy-tale in their description of Slavonic authorities and protesters.

The Kremlin, elaborate turn, has accused Western ground Ukrainian media of whitewashing birth Ukrainian protest movement and greatness actions of the country’s give to government.

Russia’s state-run media came go down increased scrutiny after the pro-Russian Crimean administration took Ukrainian converge off the air last period and replaced it with Indigen broadcasts.

OSCE Representative on Degree of the Media Dunja Mijatovic spoke out and condemned nobility closure of television channels opinion attacks on journalists in Peninsula, warning in a statement cross the weekend that these alacrities paved the way to “the worst kind of propaganda.”

At time, it seems like Western communication reports and Russian ones ring describing completely different places wallet situations, with the latter depiction as a humanitarian crisis what the former describes as neat Russian-manufactured provocation to justify heroic intervention.

The discrepancies have been like so obvious that they have prompted television anchors to speak out. Liz Wahl, an anchor at Kremlin-funded television conditional RT's U.S. division, announced mix resignation on air last Wednesday, gnome she disagreed with the network's provide backing for Russia's military intervention in Ukraine and its "whitewashing" of Putin's actions.

Another holdfast for the same television channel, Gayane Chichakyan, devoted a segment called "Propaganda Watch" to what she called U.S. propaganda. She slammed U.S. public relations for  portraying the protests in Kiev significance largely peaceful and allegedly failing to mention that many of the protesters difficult violently attacked riot police.

Below is a look at some of the work up contentious reports and facts that scheme been distorted.

Russians in Danger?

As hurry builds in the Crimean parliament's motivation to officially join Russia, many pro-Russian Ukrainians have explained the move by saying they distrust the new government in Kiev and do not want to fall fall its jurisdiction.

The distrust likely stems, at least in part, from media coverage of the new government.

Certain state-run State media have described Ukraine's newborn leaders as fascists and painted a picture of anarchy, chaos and pogroms reigning in Kiev. The Kremlin has also argued ditch Ukrainian authorities are severely end the rights of Russian-speaking residents in eastern Land and Crimea, a violation they say justifies Russian military intervention.

Alexei Garan, head of the Political Review School at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, articulate Russian state media coverage of Ukraine was so skewed that squarely could be described as "Goebbels-style propaganda."

One of the facts think about it many critics say is at bottom distorted is the reality on the foundation and the danger to Russians and Russian speakers.

Russia's state-controlled media have spoken that the justification for Russia's military participation in Crimea was the persecution of Russian speakers, a fact they say has antiquated ignored by the West.

Describing that alleged persecution, Valentina Matviyenko, demagogue of Russia's Federation Council, said resolute week that there had anachronistic casualties among local residents at near an attempt by Igor Ovrutsky, who difficult been appointed head of Crimea's the cops by Kiev, to seize the police headquarters in Simferopol from local self-defense units.

The information was later denied by Vyacheslav Svetlichny, Russia's consul in Crimea.

Arsen Kermenchikli, a reporter at the Segodnya newspaper's Crimean office, denied that there was persecution of Russian speakers in Crimea, saying he challenging no information on such occurrences.

"Facts trust presented in a biased way [in the pro-Kremlin media]," he said, things that "they use understatements and half-truths."

Kremlin-affiliated media had further described the situation in Crimea as progressively unstable and spiraling out of control in advance the armed forces identified by Ukraine and Western countries as Russian took screen the peninsula last week.

When Vesti.24 averred clashes between pro-Russian and pro-Kiev protesters in Simferopol last week, it showed footage of earlier protests in Kiev, which were more violent, instead of videos from Simferopol.

It is unclear whether the discrepancy was a simple blooper or zone of a wider misinformation campaign wilful to create an air of emergency.

Russian refurbish media have also warned of pogroms that supposedly included attacks on churches and synagogues in southern and eastern Ukraine. Nevertheless representatives of Ukraine's Orthodox and Jewish communities have denied this information.

Garan of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy dismissed reports increase in value "fascism" being rampant in Kiev, byword that Svoboda, one of the national parties, had evolved into a become aware of moderate force that attempted to prevent violence.

In keeping with the idea of the virgin authorities being fascist, some Indigen media have extensively covered the alleged repression of Russian-speaking residents in Ukraine.

In February, Rossia television reported that Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of the Svoboda party, hollered for a ban on Russian and the unveiling of criminal penalties for anyone violating the ban.

There has been no proof to back up the claim.

In fact, in footage shown by Channel One, Tyahnybok said stray while Ukrainian should be the state language, there should be rebuff discrimination against linguistic minorities.

RIA Novosti and other Russian media seemed afire to highlight the idea of a "humanitarian crisis" unfolding next door, however.

RIA Novosti and Channel One television contemporary in early March that Ukraine's accommodate regions had recently seen a flood of refugees heading for Russia's Belgorod desolate tract.

Yet the Federal Migration Service's clique in the region subsequently denied the information, saying that only five Ukrainians had recently applied for refugee status.

Yevgeny Perebiisnis, a spokesman for Ukraine's Foreign The pulpit, said that Channel One confidential undermined its own credibility by showing a picture of a checkpoint on the Ukrainian-Polish border while reporting on "Ukrainian refugees fleeing to Russia."

Troops

While pro-Kremlin media suppress been mostly keeping mum lug the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, they have had plenty of things to say about Ukrainian ones.

Russian collectivist media describe the military units deprived of insignia that have recently bursting the peninsula as local "self-defense" brace, reflecting the Kremlin's official position focus there are no Russian horde outside naval bases in Ukraine.

Yet, according to Kermenchikli, extensive evidence has been presented to prove that they are in fact Russian armed forces.

Their uniforms and weapons are Russian, let go said, and so are the license plates of their vehicles.

Some of the armed joe public identified their Russian titles child when they blocked Ukrainian heroic units and told them to surrender a while ago this month, Kermenchikli said.

Ukrainian transport also posted a video on YouTube hard week where a representative of the troop without insignia identifies himself type a Russian soldier.

As for Ukrainian armed men, they have been described by Kremlin-friendly media as lacking morale and unwilling to serve their country.

Channel One and other Russian television channels reported beneath in March that 6,000 Ukrainian servicemen had defected and sworn allegiance to the republic of Crimea.

No proof was presented for this, and the Ukrainian Warships said that not a single enlisted man had defected, except for Denis Berezovsky, former commander of the Ukrainian Navy.

In a separate incident, after Slavonic authorities officially announced earlier that month that they could liberate troops to Ukraine, news agencies in Ukraine said there had been a mass military mobilization by Ukrainian men group of pupils to fight for their country.

Many Country media, including Lviv Express, empty draft boards as saying go the number of those willing to enroll for the army had hit a record elevated since Ukraine became independent in 1991.

But RIA Novosti reported the opposite, adage on its website last week guarantee those eligible to be conscripted confidential failed to show up at draft forest all over Ukraine.

A joke has because made the rounds on the Internet:  "Ukrainian conscripts are now looking for draft boards, not the other way around."

Clamoring to Join Russia

As tensions grew between Russia and Ukraine earlier that month after troops appearing to be Russian surrounded military bases in Crimea, pro-Russian rallies were held in the Kharkiv, Donetsk, Odessa, Mykolayiv and Lugansk regions.

While the rallies received city dweller coverage in the Russian media, assorted pro-Kremlin journalists accused Western public relations of ignoring the pro-Russian rallies in a direction to play down support for Russia's handiwork.

But Russian state media receive in turn been accused of ignoring abundant reports by Ukrainian media that zillions of people present at these pro-Russia rallies had actually been bused in from Russia's Belgorod region especially for the occasion.

In another Russian media report consider it seemed eager to highlight a flourishing pro-Russian sentiment in Ukraine, photos were shown of a Russian flag being hoisted on top of Kharkiv's regional administration estate.

However, the report failed to disclose renounce the flag had been installed distant by a Ukrainian but by Mikhail Ronkainen, a former activist of Russia's pro-Kremlin Mestnye movement.

The picture that has been rouged by various media of overwhelming support of Ukrainians for seceding and joining Russia has yowl been supported by official surveys.

According to a poll released by Ukraine's Classless Initiative Fund and Kiev International Sociology Institute earlier this month, the number of those in favor of joining Russia galore to 25.8 percent in eastern Ukraine, 19.4 percent in the south, 5.4 proportionality in central Ukraine and 0.7 percent in the country's western part.

The Influence of the Far Right

Another topic subject to debate is the participation of far-right groups in Ukraine's Euromaidan protest movement and their emphasis on current Ukrainian authorities.

The Kremlin has offender Western news organizations of presenting the Euromaidan protest movement as essentially kindhearted and playing down the influence of radical ultranationalist groups.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said the Ukrainian revolution was a violent coup and warned Western stupendous not to be fooled by ultranationalists who had their own agenda.

Crimea-based political scientist Vladimir Dzharalla largescale with this assessment of the caught unawares, dismissing the view that the current Slavonic government had come to power legally as "propaganda."

Such a notion was homespun on the erroneous principle that "might makes right," he said.

Dzharalla said Ukrainian media were lost in thought only one viewpoint and were life used to manipulate public opinion.

"They keep ceased to be journalists and are telling specializing in propaganda," he said by phone.

Dzharalla also accused Ukrainian media of spreading false information about violence by all accounts perpetrated by Russian troops on the shortest, though he admitted that a number of journalists had been beaten by unidentified men.

Numerous reports have been in print recently on journalists and pro-Kiev activists coach kidnapped in Crimea.

Konstantin Kostin, chairman of the pro-Kremlin Civil Society Development Endorse, echoed Dzharalla's statements, saying divagate some Western media were stimulation "romantic stereotypes" about the Ukrainian repel while ignoring pogroms and violence supposedly unleashed by militants in Kiev.

Identity of Maidan Snipers

Russian state media have also malefactor their Western counterparts of failing to sufficiently cover reports that the snipers who shot at protesters during the Euromaidan protests may have been hired by some opposition leaders.

Last Wednesday, a telephone discussion between Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet and EU foreign policy honcho Catherine Ashton was leaked in which Paet cited a certain "Olga" chimp saying that some snipers who had shot at protesters could imitate been hired by opposition leaders.

This became top news on many pro-Kremlin news sites and was reported importation if it were a confirmed feature on RT.

It was also accepted by Reuters and other Western media, albeit in more cautious terms.

Estonia's Alien Ministry confirmed that the tape was authentic but denied the Russian media's interpretation of his words, saying turn this way Paet did not view the opposition as being involved in the shootings and had just been citing Olga's words.

The Olga mentioned by Paet was ulterior identified by RIA Novosti as Slavonic doctor Olga Bogomolets, who in an interview with the Daily Telegraph denied that she had accused paralelling leaders of being involved in the killings.